Provisions
Provisions under HGB: Rückstellungen, settlement amount and discounting
Provisions (Rückstellungen) are one of the most judgement-heavy items in a German balance sheet, and HGB regulates them tightly. This page explains what may — and may not — be provided for under § 249 HGB, how provisions are measured at their settlement amount, how long-term and pension provisions are discounted under § 253 Abs. 2, and where HGB and IFRS diverge.
What qualifies as a provision
§ 249 HGB lists exhaustively what you may recognise as a provision. The core case is a Rückstellung für ungewisse Verbindlichkeiten — an obligation to a third party that is uncertain in amount or timing but probable, such as warranty claims, litigation, taxes or restoration duties. HGB also requires a provision for impending losses on pending transactions (Drohverlustrückstellung) and permits provisions for deferred maintenance carried out early in the next year.
Crucially, § 249 Abs. 2 closes the list: provisions may not be formed for anything not named there. This bars the old pure expense provisions (Aufwandsrückstellungen) that once let companies smooth results. The distinction matters — a provision presupposes an external obligation or a looming loss, not merely a planned future expense.
Provision, accrual or liability?
Provision (Rückstellung)
The obligation exists but its amount or timing is uncertain. You estimate it. Examples: warranty claims, pending lawsuits, pension promises, dismantling obligations.
Liability (Verbindlichkeit)
Amount and due date are essentially certain — an invoice received, a loan drawn. It sits among Verbindlichkeiten, not provisions, and is stated at its repayment amount.
Deferral (RAP)
Cash has already moved but relates to another period, so it is smoothed via a Rechnungsabgrenzungsposten. No uncertain obligation is involved, which is what separates it from a provision.
How provisions are measured
Since the 2010 accounting reform (BilMoG), provisions are stated at the settlement amount required by prudent business judgement (Erfüllungsbetrag, § 253 Abs. 1 Satz 2). That means you must include expected future price and cost increases up to the settlement date — a forward-looking figure, not today's cost frozen in time. The estimate should be neither optimistic nor padded; the prudence principle guides it but does not license a hidden reserve.
For provisions with a remaining term of more than one year, § 253 Abs. 2 HGB requires discounting at the average market interest rate of the past seven years, as published monthly by the Deutsche Bundesbank for the matching maturity. Pension provisions are a special case: they may be discounted using a ten-year average rate. Discounting reduces the balance today and unwinds as interest expense over time.
Pension provisions
Direct pension commitments create a Pensionsrückstellung that often dominates the provisions line for older Mittelstand companies. The obligation is projected using actuarial assumptions — salary and pension trends, staff turnover, biometric tables — and then discounted with the ten-year average rate under § 253 Abs. 2 Satz 2. Because that rate has moved sharply over the years, the discount effect can swing the provision materially between reporting dates.
HGB brackets the smoothing benefit: the difference between using the seven-year and the ten-year averages is subject to a distribution block (Ausschüttungssperre) so it cannot be paid out as profit. Plan assets held exclusively to fund the pensions (Deckungsvermögen) are offset against the obligation and shown net, with income and expense netted in the GuV.
HGB provisions vs IFRS
IFRS (IAS 37) recognises a provision only when there is a present obligation from a past event, an outflow is probable and the amount can be estimated reliably — a narrower gate that in places lets fewer provisions through than HGB, which is more willing to anticipate losses in the name of creditor protection. The impending-loss provision required by HGB has a counterpart in IFRS onerous-contract rules, but the mechanics differ.
Measurement diverges too. IFRS discounts at a current market rate reflecting the specific risks, whereas HGB uses a smoothed seven or ten-year Bundesbank average. The result is that the same obligation can carry a different value under the two frameworks, one reason a German subsidiary's HGB numbers must be reconciled before feeding a parent's IFRS consolidation.
Frequently asked questions
What is a Rückstellung in German accounting?
A Rückstellung is a provision — an amount set aside for an obligation that is probable but uncertain in amount or timing, such as warranties, litigation, pensions or taxes. § 249 HGB defines the limited cases in which one may be recognised, and § 253 governs how it is measured.
Can you form a provision for any future expense under HGB?
No. § 249 Abs. 2 HGB makes the list of permitted provisions exhaustive. You may provide for uncertain obligations to third parties, impending losses on pending transactions and certain deferred maintenance — but not for a merely planned internal expense. Pure expense provisions were largely abolished by the 2010 reform.
How are long-term provisions discounted?
Provisions with a remaining term over one year are discounted under § 253 Abs. 2 HGB at the average market rate of the past seven years, published by the Bundesbank for the matching maturity. Pension provisions may use a ten-year average. Short-term provisions are not discounted.
What is the settlement amount principle?
Under § 253 Abs. 1 Satz 2 HGB a provision is stated at its Erfüllungsbetrag — the amount needed to settle the obligation according to prudent business judgement, including expected future price and cost increases. It is a forward-looking estimate rather than the cost at today's prices.
How do HGB and IFRS provisions differ?
HGB is more conservative and creditor-oriented, requiring provisions such as the impending-loss provision, and it discounts at a smoothed seven or ten-year average rate. IFRS (IAS 37) applies a stricter recognition test and discounts at a current risk-adjusted rate, so the same obligation can be valued differently under each.